tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16821859.post115195193753135263..comments2024-03-26T16:03:42.608-06:00Comments on Flares into Darkness: “A Good Program…to Make Us Safer…Is Over.”ambisinistralhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03836786826294202405noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16821859.post-1151968576445379892006-07-03T17:16:00.000-06:002006-07-03T17:16:00.000-06:00morganThe specific detail that the terrorists got ...morgan<BR/><BR/>The specific detail that the terrorists got out of this is that there is a delay of days between transfer and notification of such. I don't think that's disinformation because it seems extremely unlikely there could be real time surveillance of transfers unless specific entities are being surveilled anyway. Even then it's iffy.<BR/><BR/>So whatever happens to the program, whether it continues or not, or who remains involved or which institutions drop out, the terrorists and their sponsors and backers can do as StY says. <BR/><BR/>Thus the program, no matter how effective, ineffective, chimera or not, will cease to have any effectiveness at all.Sylhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03069871911665125873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16821859.post-1151956929821023652006-07-03T14:02:00.000-06:002006-07-03T14:02:00.000-06:00Seriously, they'll do just what we would do: they'...Seriously, they'll do just what we would do: they'll look for new methods. The easiest one is to simply use a different cutout every time --- pay someone to run a transfer, or threaten them; without redundancy --- repeated transactions --- there is no information.Charlie Martinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14586506407851173416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16821859.post-1151956833322659222006-07-03T14:00:00.000-06:002006-07-03T14:00:00.000-06:00And that, Morgan, is what drives analysts nuts.And that, Morgan, is what drives analysts nuts.Charlie Martinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14586506407851173416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16821859.post-1151955937461093152006-07-03T13:45:00.000-06:002006-07-03T13:45:00.000-06:00"Terrorists read the newspapers...obviously the te..."Terrorists read the newspapers...obviously the terrorists [are] not going to use these methods anymore."<BR/><BR/>Unless they read NRO, too, of course. In which case they'll believe the program is over and start using these methods again. And they won't get caught. If the program really is over.<BR/><BR/>Or, they might think the Times article was disinformation, in which case they'll believe there never was an effective program. Or that the NRO article is disinformation, in which case they'll believe the program is still going on. Or both were disinformation designed to make them think that there is an effective program in place when in reality there isn't.<BR/><BR/>They may read it, but what do they believe it tells them?Morganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13849696277722291312noreply@blogger.com