The world desperately needs more metaphysicians. Posing such a question and then almost instantaneously resolving it is more than our resident Cherokee/Choctaw/Buddhist/Stoic has attempted to date. There is a certain elegance in stating a proposition and providing the answer without reort to all that "show your work" stuff. Besides, providing evidence might invoke the Heisenberg principle or, worse yet, cause Smart Parrot to be eaten by Schrodinger's cat.
Then where would we be?
I'm still working through the allusion to Alice. Such complexity evoked in nine simple words.
C'mon Knuck,
ReplyDeleteThe world desperately needs more metaphysicians. Posing such a question and then almost instantaneously resolving it is more than our resident Cherokee/Choctaw/Buddhist/Stoic has attempted to date. There is a certain elegance in stating a proposition and providing the answer without reort to all that "show your work" stuff. Besides, providing evidence might invoke the Heisenberg principle or, worse yet, cause Smart Parrot to be eaten by Schrodinger's cat.
Then where would we be?
I'm still working through the allusion to Alice. Such complexity evoked in nine simple words.
Parrots?
ReplyDeleteI believe in diversity but isn't this carrying things a bit too far?
Who invited the transcendentalist? Wasn't one Buddhist enough?
ReplyDeleteOut of the Void comes the One
Out of the One comes Two
and out of Two comes the ten thousand things.
— Laozi
Posing such a question and then almost instantaneously resolving it is more than our resident Cherokee/Choctaw/Buddhist/Stoic has attempted to date.
ReplyDeleteDefine "I".