Fortunately, this was sent me by a friend. I thought it was funny. I am not involved in any way.
Syl:
We are making fun of the litigant who filed the uploaded "notice of appeal". It is a copy of a geniuine pleading filed in a Federal District Court in Washington to initiate the appeal of an actual civil case. The pleading was filed by a "pro se" party (one not represented by counsel).
The joke is this is not the way to favorably impress the people who will decide the case.
If so, FA, he is in the wrong district.
ReplyDelete'vet - "preparing the battle space"? ;-)
ReplyDeleteed:
ReplyDeleteYeah. Really "priming the pump".
This is one plain spoken dude.
I am pretty sure there will be some novel legal theories for the Ninth Circuit to consider.
If he draws Judge Reinhart he may have half a chance.
But in any event, he won't have to worry about being disbarred.
no, but Rule 11 may get some play methinks.
ReplyDeleteMy sympathies to you vnjagvet, if you are on the other side of this jerk. When pro se litigants lose they often sue the opposing attorneys and judges.
ReplyDeleteYou know, I haven't a clue what you all are talking about.
ReplyDeleteBrylun:
ReplyDeleteFortunately, this was sent me by a friend. I thought it was funny. I am not involved in any way.
Syl:
We are making fun of the litigant who filed the uploaded "notice of appeal". It is a copy of a geniuine pleading filed in a Federal District Court in Washington to initiate the appeal of an actual civil case. The pleading was filed by a "pro se" party (one not represented by counsel).
The joke is this is not the way to favorably impress the people who will decide the case.
The question is, "what could he be thinking"?
Okay, thanks. Gotcha.
ReplyDeleteYeah, what was he thinking? LOL
That's just one angry dude.
ReplyDelete