Thursday, October 19, 2006

How can People not see it?

How is it that people can not see that what Bush says here is true?

From Big Lizards :

It is clear from the context of the interview, even in the snippets that ABC chose to highlight in their online story, that President Bush is well aware of the real meaning of Tet; he makes it quite plain in the next thing he says after the bit quoted at the top of this post:

"George, my gut tells me that they have all along been trying to inflict enough damage that we'd leave," Bush said. "And the leaders of al Qaeda have made that very clear. Look, here's how I view it. First of all, al Qaeda is still very active in Iraq. They are dangerous. They are lethal. They are trying to not only kill American troops, but they're trying to foment sectarian violence. They believe that if they can create enough chaos, the American people will grow sick and tired of the Iraqi effort and will cause [the] government to withdraw."

In other words, the president correctly understands that the only sense in which the enemy in Iraq is "winning" is in the propaganda that they inspire and provoke among the persistently anti-American news media... as represented in this case by one George Robert Snuffleupagus, late communications director for President Bill Clinton -- now the victorious strongman of what used to be This Week With David Brinkley.

And its only victory would be if the antique media terrified enough people that they forced us into premature withdrawl of our troops, before they finished the job.

The Democrats want to negotiate a treaty with the terrorists determining how fast we hand Iraq over to al-Qaeda; this puts the Dems in the position of defeatists who declared in 1943 that we could never win the Pacific or European wars -- and who demanded that we negotiate a "settlement" with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan over how quickly they would be handed the entire eastern hemisphere.

And President Bush is absolutely correct: in the sense of political theater masquerading as warfare, Iraq indeed is very like unto Vietnam.


A friend of mine said yesterday that he thought the numbers of American fatalities in Iraq would really jump up around Halloween. After all he said "There is an election".

How pathetic is it that our troops have to be turned into targets by an election in this country? I am not saying that AlQaida and their ilk would not be wanting to kill Americans anytime. But their resources are limited so they will use them when they can do so with maximum propaganda impact, and they can count on the media and the Democrats to help them. Disgusting.

2 comments:

chuck said...

How pathetic is it that our troops have to be turned into targets by an election in this country?

Jeez, I hadn't thought of it that way, but it's true. Truely pathetic.

Anonymous said...

fresh air:

Are these people perenially trapped in their adolesence?

Well...

Yup. Resistance to Vietnam was the emotional high point of their existences. The press ancienne is interested in only two themes, basically - Watergate and Vietnam. Is this US political activity illegal and contain a cover-up? Is this US foreign policy leading to another Vietnam? Those are the only two questions of import. The motivations of others don't matter. Only the motivations of US policymakers matter. This will continue until all the Boomers within the press ancienne have retired to the Great Newsroom in the Sky, or more probably to the 10th Circle that Dante somehow omitted.