Scoundrel's End

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

The University of Colorado committee charged with investigating the seven serious charges of academic fraud against Ward Churchill has returend its verdict: guilty on every count. "Four of the five members of the investigative panel said ethnic studies professor Ward Churchill should be suspended without pay, though one said he should be fired."

This white man who found the burden of his whiteness so great in the PC era he had to become a fake Indian decided that once you've faked your identity you might as well fake your academic research too. "A [Rocky Mountain] News investigation in June found that while Churchill has maintained for decades that he is part Cherokee and Creek, there is no evidence of any Indian ancestry in his family tree." This America-hater who famously called the terrorist victims "little Eichmanns" who deserved their horrific deaths has been pulling down nearly $100k from the taxpayers of Colorado—without even having the benefit of a doctorate. Nice work if you can get it, but it looks like he won't be getting it much longer. His wife is already resigning, and even the Democrats are now calling for his blood. "Research misconduct is considered one of the most serious offenses a faculty member can commit. And the investigative committee concluded that Churchill had consistently committed it."

It's hard to get a scam this good going most of the time, so don't expect him to roll over gently any time soon. My prediction: a golden parachute of several million courtesy of the taxpayers of Colorado. Don't let the door hit you on the way out Wardie.

Update: I don't want to exaggerate the facts here. They're damning enough on their own. Reader Rich says that he was found guilty of only six of the charges. But my source here seems to indicate that he's guilty on all seven, at least to some degree.

14 comments:

Skookumchuk said...

. . . though one said he should be fired.

Wow. One entire professor said that. Astounding.

chuck said...

It's hard to get a scam this good going most of the time,

"Teach a man to fish, and he will go hungry when the fish don't bite. Teach a man a good scam and the suckers will bite forever."

-- Michael Swanwick

terrye said...

I remember when this whole thing started that there were academics calling the man a fraud.

Rick Ballard said...

"One entire professor said that."

Now, Skook, the Gramscian worms got into the academic apple one at a time in the beginning.

It's a start. Sami al Arian? is dtr too.

If only I could feel better about the hiring of his replacement.

Fresh Air said...

Unbelievable that only one of the investigators recommended he be fired. Higher learning in this country is, to put it mildly, a moral relativism hellhole.

Skookumchuk said...

Though the incipient Alzheimer's and a lifetime of Mexican beers aren't helping me at this moment, I do recall that Herr Doktor came to a local community college up here, which when given the above publicity photo, promptly had their in-house inheritors of the grand tradition of Lavrenty Beria amputate his right arm with the appropriate photo software and with it the offending evil gun.

I understand there was another photo showing him with cigarette in hand and of course they agonized over that one, too.

chuck said...

I understand there was another photo showing him with cigarette in hand and of course they agonized over that one, too.

I suppose that when carried to the ultimate, he would end up a neutered quadraplegic. Oh well.

The suggested suspensions were for 2-3 years. I suppose that would be enough to make most look for work elsewhere, but it sure is a copout. Scholars should have a bit more pride in their profession. Really, there is no reason whatsoever to have Churchill on the faculty: fake indian, fake scholar. No reason at all.

truepeers said...

Only one professor volunteered for the firing squad? Kind of defeats the whole idea. And suspended without pay would mean what? That he has to take a little time-out, but can still pull in the speakers' gigs as the famous professor of the U of C?

It's weird feeling torn between anger and an inability to keep a straight face.

rich said...

Not guilty on every count, guilty on six of the seven counts. The seventh count was not substantiated.

Doesn't change the message.

What was very interesting to me is that they found he ghost wrote some articles and then cited the articles as substantiation for his position. That takes real nerve.

chuck said...

That takes real nerve.

What's the academic analog of the silver star? I'm beginning to think he really does deserve it. From the academic point of view. Maybe the whole darn thing is a scam.

truepeers said...

Maybe the whole darn thing is a scam.

- a little harsh; i'd say only about three-quarters of the humanities and social sciences are an intellectual scam. Of course, if you haven't yet come to believe you're being scammeed, is it really a scam? After all, "whatever gets you through the night" is one of the two (along with the occasional need for more fundamental truths) essential purposes of culture.

rich said...

Here is the quote from the pdf of the summary of the findings

http://www.colorado.edu/news/reports/churchill/download/ChurchillReportSummary.pdf

The Committee did not find fabrication in the first sub-question of Allegation D or
plagiarism in Allegation F.

You correctly cited your source, it looks like your source got it wrong.

Knucklehead said...

Suspended without pay. While he is suspended without pay the intellectual bankrupts of academia will make sure that he has more than sufficient speaking engagements to make up whatever pay he loses. Sometime in the near future, when nobody is paying attention any longer, the same academic IBs who suggestion suspension without pay will meet again to suggest that the duration of the suspension should count toward time-in-service benefits and that it would probably be most just to just reimburse the suspended "professor" for salary lost while he was suspende.

Stay tuned.

Skookumchuk said...

It is very interesting that in those institutions where tenure is established, ostensibly to protect freedom of expression, like the academy and the civil service, you also see the greatest uniformity of thought.