You know, by the way, Kurtz thinks it's interesting that "even Hans Blix" is saying Ahmadinejad has nuclear intentions.
Forgive me if I am wrong, but didn't Hans Blix say that Iraq was hiding WMD's from him, right up until the day we decided the inspections weren't going to work?
Wasn't it only after that that Blix changes his tune?
The whole topic revolts me. We all know Iran is after the bomb, we all know they will get it soon, we all know they aren't benign, we all know that once they get it they will eventually use it malignantly--perhaps to wipe Israel off the map, perhaps to hand off to terrorists inside the US--and we all know that we're not going to do a damn thing about it, so what's to say?
6 comments:
Maybe Stanley is Blixed.
This guy is making it hard to ignore him.
I fear that he sees himself fulfilling some prophetic end of the world scenario.
That's funny. I think most conservative bloggers post on Ahmadinejad at least a few times a week.
Where is that guy surfing? Winkette?
You know, by the way, Kurtz thinks it's interesting that "even Hans Blix" is saying Ahmadinejad has nuclear intentions.
Forgive me if I am wrong, but didn't Hans Blix say that Iraq was hiding WMD's from him, right up until the day we decided the inspections weren't going to work?
Wasn't it only after that that Blix changes his tune?
The whole topic revolts me. We all know Iran is after the bomb, we all know they will get it soon, we all know they aren't benign, we all know that once they get it they will eventually use it malignantly--perhaps to wipe Israel off the map, perhaps to hand off to terrorists inside the US--and we all know that we're not going to do a damn thing about it, so what's to say?
MHA, I remember when John Derbyshire wqas telling me exactly that about iraq.
Post a Comment