"A straightforward case" for criminal prosecution

Monday, April 24, 2006
Citing 18 U.S.C. §793(d), Andrew McCarthy at NRO thinks it's a "straightforward case" for prosecution of Mary O. McCarthy (no relation), the Democrat CIA leaker.

(Maybe he was reading the discussion on Flares over the weekend.)

UPDATE: James Taranto in his Best of the Web Today column, quotes Andrew McCarthy, and also adds:

"If Mrs. McCarthy leaked information that came her way as part of an inspector general's investigation, there also is no reason to assume that it--or the Pulitzer prize-winning story it helped produce--is true. Investigators often gather material that does not pan out or that turns out to be false or exaggerated."

And as to why there isn't yet a criminal prosecution, Taranto notes:

"The obvious answer is that she was fired based on an internal investigation, and the Justice Department, which would handle any prosecution, operates at its own pace."

9 comments:

Knucklehead said...

I have no idea what the pros and cons of prosecuting her would be. I do know that from what little I heard on the tube over the weekend that the left leaning pundits are livid about this. I'm just a knucklehead so how firing a CIA employee for leaking classified info represents an unprecedented level of intimidation of the press is beyond me. From listening to them shriek one might get the idea that they viewed classified info leakers as full-fledged members of the MSM.

Fresh Air said...

Knuckle--

The pro would be she would be locked up, perhaps for the rest of her natural life.

I'm not aware of any cons.

Knucklehead said...

FA,

Cons, if what she was leaking was info about "secret prisons" might be the media circus court case with the corresponding difficulties regarding keeping other classified info properly under wraps.

I'm not suggesting she shouldn't be prosecuted just that there may be reasons to think twice about doing so.

BTW, Jim Miller points to an interesting little Wikepedia tidbit in which it is alleged that, in 1995:

On July 31, the U.S. News & World Report published a classified diagram of America's W-87 nuclear warhead. Allegedly, a reporter for the magazine obtained the document from Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary during an interview. According to Rep. Curt Weldon (Republican-Pennsylvania), O'Leary "opened up a ledger of classified documents sitting on her desk and proceeded to show the reporter a diagram of the W-87 warhead in order to prove a point. She then handed the classified diagram of the nuclear warhead to the reporter. Her staff attempted to protest, pointing out that the document was classified. O'Leary hesitated a moment, took the document back from the reporter, crossed out the word 'classified' and promptly gave it back to the U.S. News staffer."

Barry Dauphin said...

Well, Vodkapundit presented an interesting tidbit for the story. It seems that back in 1998, McCarthy was hired by none other than Sandy Burglar Isn't it a small world?

terrye said...

The only con I can think of is that the press will make a martyr of her. Sad but true.

terrye said...

I just looked at strata-sphere and AJ says there is a bit of walk back on this. Did the press and the blogs jump the gun?

Rick Ballard said...

Terrye,

I'd say there was an anticipatory announcement to allow her to get her version out first in the event an indictment comes down. There are denials that she was a "source" but that is unsurprising.

The connections between her, Berger, Beers, Clarke and other Kerry players are real as are her donations to the Kerry campaign and the DNC. The press play that she is St. Mary of the Blessed Leak is understandable but I don't believe that it will hold up. Too many party connections.

An official DoJ announcement that she is the target of an investigation would be helpful.

Knucklehead said...

Rick,

With Rove out of the "policy" realm and into the election strategy realm do you suppose we might soon see the dots being connected in ads?

Rick Ballard said...

Knuck,

Not ads. It would be a waste of money - the electorate can't hold a thought long enough to justify an ad buy. Hewitt, Limbaugh, Lucianne, American Thinker (which can feed all before) - that's where this will be developed. The corruption and security bit are small change for the mid-term, which is generally a GOTV problem for the base - not really issue driven ('94 being the exception).

Right now the kicker is OPEC and a possible summer boycott - economic rather than bomb terrorism. The oily Arab princes are making calculations on what effect a Dem Congress might have on their livelihoods and I don't particularly like the thoughts running through their greedy brains. $5 gas through the summer might affect the elections.

It might affect the mood of the populace concerning taking out Iraq and breaking OPEC for good, too.