Who said this? (A quiz)

Saturday, July 01, 2006
"In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now. The experience of a number of European countries and Japan have borne this out. This country's own experience with tax reduction in 19XX has borne this out. And the reason is that only full employment can balance the budget, and tax reduction can pave the way to that employment. The purpose of cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus.

I repeat: our practical choice is not between a tax-cut deficit and a budgetary surplus. It is between two kinds of deficits: a chronic deficit of inertia, as the unwanted result of inadequate revenues and a restricted economy, or a temporary deficit of transition, resulting from a tax cut designed to boost the economy, increase tax revenues, and achieve, I believe — and I believe this can be done — a budget surplus. The first type of deficit is a sign of waste and weakness; the second reflects an investment in the future."


Answer in the comments, along with a link.

3 comments:

Seneca the Younger said...

John F Kennedy.

It kind of makes me crazy that while beatifying John Kennedy and demonizing George W, it's clear that John Kennedy and George W have nearly the same actual policies.

Skookumchuk said...

Yes, but one wears cowboy hats.

terrye said...

I thought so. I wonder if Kennedy would be a Democrat today.