“One has to wonder what planet he’s been living on to continue to assert...”Patrick Fitzgerald lives on a planet which amply rewards him for filthing on the Bush administration. We can take it for granted that eventually he will be offered a million dollar advance for a book “revealing his courage in fighting a corrupt White House.” What would have almost certainly occurred had he simply done his job? The investigation would have been completed in less than two weeks. Ftizgerald’s name would have been dragged in the mud for a few days---and then forgotten. He would not even rate as a decent Trivial Pursuit question.
Don't forget the academic appointment a la Anita Hill.
Thanks. Though "prominent" is debatable.I really appreciate your posting this. I'm afraid it is getting harder and harder to get people to pay attention to what happened and the lies in the beginning are what will stick in the public mind.
DT,The "investigation" was complete within two months of Fitzgerald's illegal appointment. As Clarice notes, by Feb. '04 Fitz had the names of Novak's sources. His actions from that point on were of a persecutorial rather than prosecutorial nature. While there is some entertainment value in watching him be hoist by his own petard, one must sympathize for this Inspector Clouvert's victim. There is also a bit of ex parte nastiness going on to which Judge Walton needs to put a stop. Fitzgerald has already made a fool of Judge Tatel through his specious affidavits. Trying to pull the wool over Judge Walton's eyes with whispers of a "continuing investigation" needs to be brought to a halt.
I am convinced that the leftist establishment also thought the Fitzgerald investigation would be over in a very short period of time. Common sense dictated that no laws were broken. Left wing Democrats were merely slinging some bovine excrement at the fan hoping some it might stick. And in this particular case---it did! Wow, did it ever. I’m convinced that this nonsense alone helped to tighten the presidential race. It wrongly convinced many Americans that George W. Bush is not trustworthy. We should never forget that once upon a time---most people regardless of political orientation considered the president to be an honest man. Sadly, no more.
It is sad, David, because the Administration as far as I can see (and the SSCI/Silberman and Butler Commissions concur) it was honestly reporting the consensus opinion of the intel agencies. (Consensus is never uananimity and the caliber of the information they got was generally crap filtered thru the CIA and DoS which was committed to not see any connection between Saddam and 9/11 and which wanted to maintain the status quo at whatever cost to national security, believing terrorism was a tolerable cost we could continue to bear..
“While there is some entertainment value in watching him be hoist by his own petard, one must sympathize for this Inspector Clouvert's victim.”Victim? How does one sign up this kind of martyrdom? Patrick Fitzgerald is really suffering. It must be hell on deciding whether to purchase a Bentley or a Rolls Royce.
DT,I shouldn't speak for Rick but I think the victim he alluded to is Libby. There is entertainment value in watching Fitzgerald be shown a fool but the fact of the matter is that Libby had to resign his job and hire expensive lawyers and, as others have noted, his reputation and that of the President have suffered because of this ridiculous indictment by Fitzgerald.
I forget that others are not following this as intently (doggedly?) as I am. The reference to Inspector Clouvert is to Fitzgerald who shows all the insight of Inspector Clouseau matched with perserverance of Inspector Jouvert.Sort of a rabid pit bull chasing his own tail. He needs putting down.
Rick, Some of us pay very close attention to what you write.
Wow, this is a terrific article. Clarification, thy name is Clarice.
Syl,It is interesting to contrast the clarity in writing between practioners of the law and theorists. I've stopped reading most of the law blogs where the authors are professors because of both the verbosity of the profs and the absolute shallowness of many of the law students who seem to comprise the majority of the commenters. Reading Brylun, Vnjagvet and Clarice is like breathing fresh air after being in a stuffy room.The Chief Justice writes with that sort of clarity - or he did in his first opinion, anyway. I'm actually looking forward to reading more of them - which hasn't precisely been the case in the past.
"I shouldn't speak for Rick but I think the victim he alluded to is Libby"I am a moron. When can I be scheduled for my desperately needed lobotomy?
Post a Comment