Saturday, October 21, 2006

A Second Hand Conjecture » The Politics of Bad Faith

A Second Hand Conjecture » The Politics of Bad Faith: "When Ralph Peters, argues for such things he is a bloodthirsty warmonger who wants to kill more Muslims, with Greg the policy denotes him as a hard headed realist. I can only see one difference (not that they are two peas in a pod, there are notable differences, but that their policy prescriptions when it comes to this facet are similar, both advocate more force) from the point of view of someone who criticizes Mr. Peters so forcefully. Ralph Peters might criticize the President and this administration, but not with nearly the vitriol of Greg. If applying more force, increasing troops and combating militias to improve security does not mean Greg deserves the label warmonger, but others arguing for some variation of that who are not as vehement in denouncing this administration do deserve such criticism, then we are talking bad faith. It is not the policy that is the issue it is the political outcome. That is fine and pretty common, just don’t expect me to view such arguments with anything but contempt."


Rick Ballard said...

Maybe banal is better. What color drapes did they finally pick for the faculty lounge?

MeaninglessHotAir said...

The Iraq War seems to have driven people slightly crazy. It's sad really, but I suppose they would have going on about spaceships and asteroids if there were no war to buck them up.