Friday, December 29, 2006

Lieberman calls for more troops

In an oped in today's Washington Post, Joe Lieberman makes a case for more troops in Iraq. I am not sure if more troops will help or not, but Lieberman does make a good argument. Interesting thing is that this Democrat will vote like a Republican on this issue at least and that ties up the Senate.

This bloodshed, moreover, is not the inevitable product of ancient hatreds. It is the predictable consequence of a failure to ensure basic security and, equally important, of a conscious strategy by al-Qaeda and Iran, which have systematically aimed to undermine Iraq's fragile political center. By ruthlessly attacking the Shiites in particular over the past three years, al-Qaeda has sought to provoke precisely the dynamic of reciprocal violence that threatens to consume the country.

On this point, let there be no doubt: If Iraq descends into full-scale civil war, it will be a tremendous battlefield victory for al-Qaeda and Iran. Iraq is the central front in the global and regional war against Islamic extremism.

To turn around the crisis we need to send more American troops while we also train more Iraqi troops and strengthen the moderate political forces in the national government. After speaking with our military commanders and soldiers there, I strongly believe that additional U.S. troops must be deployed to Baghdad and Anbar province -- an increase that will at last allow us to establish security throughout the Iraqi capital, hold critical central neighborhoods in the city, clamp down on the insurgency and defeat al-Qaeda in that province.

In Baghdad and Ramadi, I found that it was the American colonels, even more than the generals, who were asking for more troops. In both places these soldiers showed a strong commitment to the cause of stopping the extremists. One colonel followed me out of the meeting with our military leaders in Ramadi and said with great emotion, "Sir, I regret that I did not have the chance to speak in the meeting, but I want you to know on behalf of the soldiers in my unit and myself that we believe in why we are fighting here and we want to finish this fight. We know we can win it."


David Thomson said...

Joseph Lieberman is one of the most important members of the U.S. Senate. He is holding the rest of the Democrat senators and their "realistic" Republican allies' feet to the fire. There is even a good possibility that the Connecticut representative is more reliable in the war on terror than President Bush.

terrye said...

I doubt is Lieberman is more stalwart than bush, but he is important, very much so.